The Pride alliance begins their response to the Grybowski contreversy with the following sentence, and I quote:
"One of the main concerns that we have is that the Broadside actually allowed for the article to be printed."
This blatant disregard for the fundamental freedom of speech and the press is far more appalling than anything which might have been in the Grybowski opinion piece. Unfortunately, its all-too typical of the modern brand of self-righteous, hypocritical campus pseudo-liberal which infests the colleges of our nation. An intelligent, mature individual or organization who was offended by or disagreed with an article printed in a newspaper would write and then submit a article in rebuttal to the first one, using intelligent arguments and their own research to address and refute the points in the original they disagreed with. But I guess that campus PC'ers are too busy making fascist demands for censorship that would do any Communist dictator proud, whining, and staging childish protests to hone and employ the skills of good writing and research.
Is this anything more than a summary of a of a highly ideological op-ed about an 8 years old issue. What does Mason think? What does that ABA have to say for themselves? That would be news. This is opinion at best. Skewed ideological propaganda at worst.
Comments
16 April 2008
2 years 16 weeks
I rather liked the article...
I also don't see what this has to do with the Gryboski-Pride Alliance controversy.
7 May 2008
2 years 16 weeks
The Pride alliance begins their response to the Grybowski contreversy with the following sentence, and I quote:
"One of the main concerns that we have is that the Broadside actually allowed for the article to be printed."
This blatant disregard for the fundamental freedom of speech and the press is far more appalling than anything which might have been in the Grybowski opinion piece. Unfortunately, its all-too typical of the modern brand of self-righteous, hypocritical campus pseudo-liberal which infests the colleges of our nation. An intelligent, mature individual or organization who was offended by or disagreed with an article printed in a newspaper would write and then submit a article in rebuttal to the first one, using intelligent arguments and their own research to address and refute the points in the original they disagreed with. But I guess that campus PC'ers are too busy making fascist demands for censorship that would do any Communist dictator proud, whining, and staging childish protests to hone and employ the skills of good writing and research.
7 May 2008
2 years 16 weeks
Is this anything more than a summary of a of a highly ideological op-ed about an 8 years old issue. What does Mason think? What does that ABA have to say for themselves? That would be news. This is opinion at best. Skewed ideological propaganda at worst.