OPINION: Power and femininity are not mutually exclusive
During my senior year of high school, I was required to write a research paper on the topic of my choice. I chose a subject regarding the expression of feminism in America. I focused on situations in which women took over a more masculine role than was traditional, such as in the popular musical “Chicago,” where the women murder their significant others. As I reflect on that paper, I realize that I do not agree with my previous viewpoint on what constituted feminism. Being a feminist is not synonymous with acting like a man. Instead, I believe that feminism is taking pride in one’s unique femininity and using their abilities to take charge.
Sadly, this topic is now more relevant than ever with the recent publicized rape cases that have been broadcast across America. Amy Davidson, a writer for The New Yorker recently wrote an excellent article in which she criticized CNN’s behavior regarding the Steubenville rape scandal. She looks down upon those who pity the rapists and questions if the victim really “didn’t want to bring these charges.” The fact that an article like this is even necessary is proof that, as opposed to the proper moral response in light of recent events—support for the punishment of the rapists—some people claim that the girls were asking for it by getting intoxicated and wearing short skirts. To this, I say shut up. It is entirely possible to stay safe without donning a power suit. Plenty of women have given off that “don’t mess” attitude without chipping a nail—think Jackie Kennedy or Oprah.
Rosie the Riveter is probably the most recognizable symbol of feminism throughout the ages; she was created to represent women who took over men’s factory roles during World War II. It could be argued that Rosie represents the “male mentality,” but I believe the point to be taken from her is that she inspired many women to uphold personally fulfilling patriotic duties upon their own decision. The iconic image of Rosie depicts her in a dress and lipstick, yet she is flexing her arm; the juxtaposition of the feminine touches and display of strength stresses that women can be kick ass by just being women, rather than by emulating men.
Yet even today, some women believe they need to cut back on their femininity in order to stay safe and be taken seriously. My belief is that this is unnecessary. Don’t be anyone you are not, but if you are naturally effeminate, then so be it. Being a powerful, strong woman by no means requires you to man yourself up. Take Michelle Obama, for instance—she does everything but stand in the shadow of her husband, Barack Obama. In fact, she is a former lawyer who has started her own heavily publicized healthy living movement, “Let’s Move,” all the while wearing dresses, skirts and floral prints. And she certainly doesn’t seem to be slowing down any time soon; with President Obama’s new term, she is taking advantage of even more opportunities to make a difference.
Basically, I am fed up with the assumption that feminine women are less capable than others. The chemicals in nail polish do not cause intelligence to seep out of the female brain, jewelry does not absorb our efficiency and baking cupcakes does not result in a total loss of abilities. In fact, traditional femininity provides women with a valuable approachable nature, warmth and empathy that is more important than ever in today’s increasingly communication based workforce. So, ladies, you just keep on wearing pink to your heart’s content.
Opinions expressed in this column are solely the beliefs of the writer.
Would you like to respond to this article with a letter to the editor? If so, send an email to exec.editor@connect2mason.com with the subject line "letter to the editor." Please specify to which article your letter is responding.